The martian surface and thin atmosphere as seen from the Viking 1 orbiter [Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech]
Exposure to cosmic radiation has long been known to be a problem for astronauts destined for deep space. Such missions can take years, subjecting anything or anyone onboard to a mix of high- and low-energy particles called Galactic Cosmic Rays (GCRs) and Solar Energetic Particles (SEPs), respectively.
Characterizing the GCRs and SEPs that spacecraft absorb is essential for improving space vehicle safety—and remains a particularly important consideration as a manned mission to Mars, a planet over 50 million kilometers away, may be becoming more feasible. But previous attempts to do so have been less than ideal. Studies have recorded radiation from vehicles without shields, but humans traveling to Mars will only go in vessels with shield defenses.
Now, a report based on measurements taken from the shielded spacecraft that delivered the Curiosity rover to Mars indicates that the radiation dose experienced by an astronaut traveling to and from the Red Planet would represent a large fraction of his or her accepted lifetime limit.
The report, featured in the 31 May issue of Science, provides the first-ever insight into the deep space radiation hazards from a shielded vessel. Cary Zeitlin at Southwest Research Institute and colleagues, detail the radiation environment aboard the Mars Science Laboratory (MSL)—the vessel that carried Curiosity to Martian soil in 2011 and 2012.
Zeitlin added a cautionary note to those who want to use the results to make definitive pronouncements about the feasibility of a human mission to Mars, however. “Radiation exposure at the level we measured is right at the edge, or possibly over the edge of what is considered acceptable in terms of career exposure limits defined by NASA and other space agencies. Those limits depend on our understanding of the health risks associated with exposure to cosmic radiation, and at present, that understanding is quite limited.”
“Data from our study are different because the radiation detector we used, Radiation Assessment Detector, or RAD, was under quite a bit of shielding,” explained Zeitlin. The Mars Science Laboratory was protected by a complex shield far thicker than that on the Apollo spacecraft, for example. “Thus our measurement is the first of its kind.”
For most of the MSL’s 253-day journey to Mars, which lasted from 26 November 2011 to 6 August 2012, RAD made detailed measurements of the energetic particle radiation environment in the MSL interior, producing a rich dataset. “I’m perpetually excited to see RAD work so well,” Zeitlin said.
Because the shielding provided by the MSL is roughly similar to shielding likely to be used for future human trips to deep space, the RAD-reported doses onboard are realistic estimates of astronaut exposure.
Based on these measurements, and assuming similar shields and timing in the solar cycle, as well as a trip duration of 180 days (NASA’s typical estimate for a fast outbound flight to Mars), Zeitlin and colleagues reported their finding of the likely radiation dose for an astronaut traveling to and from Mars.
Time spent on the Martian surface would increase that dose. Because the work of Zeitlin and his team considers just the radiation exposure on the trip to Mars and back, he said the team’s next step is to continue the radiation measurements from Curiosity as it travels over the Martian surface. “Publishing these results will give the research community additional information to use in evaluating mission scenarios.”
Making this data available is especially critical in light of some of the Mars landing scenarios considered by NASA. “In some of them,” Zeitlin explained, “the sequence of events is the trip to Mars, followed by something like 500 days on the surface, and then the trip back. The time on the surface is the longest part.”
Prior to the work by Zeitlin and his team, there have been several calculations of the radiation exposure an astronaut on a Mars mission would receive. These predictions were made using models that incorporated educated guesses about the shielding distribution of the vessels used, as well as assumptions about the state of the solar cycle, both of which affect radiation exposures.
Along these lines, Zeitlin explained that he was surprised by the solar cycle state during MSL’s cruise to Mars.
“Based on predictions about solar cycle progression from a few years ago,” he said, “we’d have expected to be at or near solar maximum in late 2011 and the first half of 2012.” Solar maximum is associated with a strong solar magnetic field, which suppresses the intensity of GCRs. Instead, the current solar maximum has been very weak so far, with relatively little solar activity. “And because of the weak solar maximum,” Zeitlin explained, “the flux of GCRs during the trip to Mars was on the high side.”
Even so, the results from this study are representative of a trip to Mars under conditions of low to moderate solar activity and fall within the range of previously modeled predictions for radiation exposure on a mission to Mars.
Zeitlin said that it is very exciting to be part of the MSL Science Team and the larger mission to better understand the climate, geology and mineralogy of Mars. “We have a front-row seat for results as they come in from other instruments,” he said. “In addition to our own work, we get to see and hear about all the great work the other instrument teams are doing.”
Read the abstract, “Measurements of Energetic Particle Radiation in Transit to Mars on the Mars Science Laboratory,” by Cary Zeitlin and colleagues.
Listen to a related Science Podcast. Meagan Phelan
30 May 2013