1

Highlights

Federal support for R&D continues to flourish in the new era of federal budget surpluses, at least for the most favored priorities. Although it was expected that tight statutory caps on discretionary spending would result in a painful FY 2000 budget process of allocating cuts, Congress and President Clinton, while technically sticking to the caps, obliterated them in practice and competed to award large increases for discretionary programs. Most areas of federal support of R&D receive moderate increases in FY 2000, even after a last-minute across-the-board cut in all discretionary spending, while selected high-priority areas in defense and health R&D receive substantial increases.

  • Total federal support for R&D in FY 2000 increases substantially to $83.3 billion, $4.0 billion or 5.0 percent more than FY 1999, primarily because of large increases for the Department of Defense (DOD) and the National Institutes of Health (NIH). There are increases in R&D funding for most agencies, but some receive increases less than the rate of inflation or even cuts in their R&D programs (see Table 1).

  • The FY 2000 R&D total is $5.4 billion above the President's request. Final FY 2000 appropriations for DOD's R&D exceed the request by more than $4.0 billion because of strong congressional support for increased defense spending after more than a decade of cuts. Congress awarded NIH $1.8 billion more for R&D than it had requested. Most other agencies received less for their R&D programs than requested (see Table 1).

· Nondefense R&D totals $40.9 billion, an increase of 7.1 percent or $2.7 billion over FY 1999, the first time the federal civilian investment exceeds $40 billion. Nearly all of the substantial increase is due to a $2.2 billion or 14.4 percent boost for NIH R&D. Excluding NIH, however, nondefense R&D rises only 2.4 percent to $23.7 billion, barely ahead of the expected inflation rate of 2.0 percent. Funding for nondefense R&D in FY 2000 is 12.1 percent higher than the FY 1994 level in inflation-adjusted terms, but this is due to increases for NIH. If NIH is excluded, nondefense R&D is 4.4 percent below the FY 1994 level in inflation-adjusted terms (see Table A).

· After a decade of cuts or only modest increases, total defense R&D increases 3.1 percent to $42.5 billion. The "Science and Technology" portion of DOD's budget (encompassing basic and applied research plus exploratory technology development) increases by 11.0 percent to $8.7 billion.

  • Basic research is a high priority in FY 2000 appropriations. Federal support for basic research is expected to total $19.1 billion in FY 2000, an increase of $1.8 billion or 10.6 percent (see Table 2). The increases, however, go mostly to life sciences and medical research funded by NIH. Although the total for basic research is $1.0 billion higher than the request, the President's request would have spread increases more evenly among the agencies.

  • The total NIH budget in FY 2000 is $17.8 billion (up $2.2 billion or 14.3 percent), but $3.0 billion is withheld until September 29, 2000. In FY 2000, NIH provides, for the first time, more than half of total federal support for basic research.

  • Health-related R&D ($18.7 billion, up 14.1 percent) and energy R&D ($1.3 billion, up 9.3 percent) are clear priorities in the FY 2000 budget by mission (Table 3). Defense R&D increases by $1.3 billion or 3.1 percent to $42.5 billion. Once again, it is a majority of the federal R&D portfolio, even though the Clinton Administration request would have made nondefense R&D more than half of the portfolio for the first time since FY 1980.

  • Information technology (IT) research was a high priority for the Clinton Administration in the FY 2000 request. The Administration proposed $366 million for a new six-agency Information Technology for the 21st Century (IT2) initiative to support long-term fundamental research in IT. Though not labeled as IT2, new fundamental research activities in IT receive $235 million in FY 2000, including $126 million for the National Science Foundation (NSF) and $60 million for DOD.

Table of Contents Next