1

Highlights

On February 13, the 108th Congress approved the 11 unfinished fiscal year (FY) 2003 appropriations bills in an omnibus package, completing a task the 107th Congress should have finished. President Bush signed the omnibus bill on February 20, finally providing final FY 2003 budgets for agencies that had been operating at FY 2002 levels on stopgap appropriations for more than four months. The budget provides a record-breaking increase for defense R&D, nearly completes the campaign to double the National Institutes of Health (NIH) budget over five years, and offers a substantial increase for the National Science Foundation (NSF).

 - The federal investment in research and development (R&D) hits a new record of $117.3 billion in FY 2003, a $14.2 billion or 13.8 percent increase over FY 2002 that is the largest dollar increase in history coming after another record increase last year, and the largest percentage increase in 20 years (see Table 1 and Figure 1).


Figure 1. (click on the image to view or download a full-page color PDF version of the chart)

- In contrast to proposed cuts for most agencies in the budget request, the FY 2003 budget provides at least modest increases for nearly all the major R&D funding agencies (see Table 1 and Figure 2). The priority areas of defense, health, general science, and homeland security receive even greater increases. The largest dollar and percentage increases go to the two largest R&D funding agencies, the Department of Defense (DOD) and NIH, reflecting the high priority placed on defense and health by the Bush Administration and Congress. DOD R&D increases by $8.8 billion or 17.6 percent to reach $58.6 billion following a similar increase last year. NIH R&D increases 15.5 percent to $26.2 billion to fall only slightly short of completing a five-year campaign to double the NIH budget. Among the other agencies, NSF does well with an 11.4 percent boost in its R&D funding to an all-time high of $3.9 billion, which could be the first installment of a five-year campaign to double its budget.


Figure 2. (click on the image to view or download a full-page color PDF version of the chart)

- There are large increases for basic and applied research in FY 2003, especially in NIH. The total federal investment in research is $52.9 billion, an increase of 9.7 percent or $4.7 billion over FY 2002 that is well above the FY 2003 request (see Table 2 and Figure 2). NIH remains the largest single sponsor of basic and applied research; in FY 2003, NIH alone will fund 47 percent of all federal support of research, its highest share in history. All federal departments except the Departments of Transportation (DOT) and Commerce receive increases for their research portfolios, with especially large increases for research in NIH, NSF, and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).

 - Although it was officially created only at the end of January, the new Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is poised to become a major player in federal R&D funding. For FY 2003, R&D programs scheduled to transfer to the new department this year would receive $669 million in R&D funding, nearly triple the $266 million for comparable programs in FY 2002. Because there is no budget account yet for DHS, these programs are funded in FY 2003 in their current agencies (DOT, DOD, USDA, and DOE) and will transfer to DHS beginning March 1. In FY 2004, when the new DHS will initiate its own R&D programs, DHS R&D would jump to $1.0 billion in the request.

 - R&D for nearly all the national missions increases, with especially large boosts for defense and health R&D (see Table 3). In defense, DOD S&T investments exceed $11 billion to reach $11.2 billion (up 8.6 percent) but there are even larger increases for DOD development projects. In health, the NIH budget nearly doubles between FY 1998 and FY 2003 with a $3.5 billion increase in FY 2003 to $26.2 billion for R&D, including substantial increases for bioterrorism research and bioterrorism research facilities. Another priority would be general science programs, up 6.4 percent to $7.0 billion, led by an 11.4 percent for NSF’s R&D programs but moderated by flat funding for the Department of Energy’s (DOE) Office of Science. Space R&D would also be a big winner with a 9.2 percent increase to $10.1 billion because of large increases in the Space Science program and a continuing shift from aeronautics R&D to space-related technology development. The only area of R&D to decline would be transportation (down 7.6 percent to $1.7 billion) because of cutbacks in NASA aeronautics R&D and a decline in DOT R&D.


Figure 3. (click on the image to view or download a full-page color PDF version of the chart)

 - Nondefense R&D reaches another all-time high in FY 2003, the seventh year in a row that nondefense R&D has increased in inflation-adjusted terms (see Figure 3). A large part of this recent growth has been due to steady growth in the NIH budget, including increases of approximately 15 percent for five years in a row. As a result, NIH R&D has become nearly as large as all other nondefense agencies’ R&D funding combined. Funding for nondefense R&D excluding NIH has stagnated in recent years; after steady growth in the 1980s, funding peaked in FY 1994 and then declined sharply as a result of tight budget conditions in the mid-1990s. The FY 2003 increases for non-NIH agencies, while large, just barely bring these agencies back to the funding levels of the early 1990s. The FY 2004 budget request, already released, would provide increases smaller than the expected rate of inflation for nondefense R&D compared to FY 2003 (see AAAS Report XXVIII: R&D FY 2004 for details of the FY 2004 request).

 - R&D earmarks total $1.4 billion in FY 2003, according to a AAAS analysis of congressionally designated, performer-specific R&D projects in the final FY 2003 budget. Although these projects amount to only 1.2 percent of total R&D, they are concentrated in a few key agencies and programs. Four agencies (USDA, $297 million; NASA, $190 million; DOE, $138 million; and DOD, $426 million) receive nearly three-quarters of the total R&D earmarks. FY 2003 earmarks are down $26 million from the $1.5 billion in FY 2002.

Table of Contents Next