American Association for the Advancement of Science

AAAS R&D Funding Update June 18, 2004 -


House Gives $200 Million Boost to DHS R&D

Go to:

-Table. House Action on R&D in the Dept. of Homeland Security

PDF version of this document

See also:

"DHS R&D Wins Big Increase in FY 2005 Budget"- (DHS R&D in the FY 2005 Request)

"Bush Proposes to Cut Nondefense R&D Over the Next Five Years
to Reduce Deficit
,"

AAAS Analysis of the Outyear Projections for R&D in the FY 2005 Budget (April 22; revised May 7)

Table. AAAS Analysis of the Outyear Projections for Nondefense R&D in the FY 2005 Budget (PDF - May 6)

 

Highlights

 - The House would give the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) a dramatically expanded R&D budget of $1.2 billion in FY 2005, up $200 million or 19.3 percent from this year after an even larger increase last year (see Table).

 - The House would add funds to the DHS request for university programs, interoperable communications, shipping container security, and air cargo security technologies. Compared to FY 2004, the largest DHS R&D increase would go to biological countermeasures, including construction of a new biodefense laboratory.  

 - In addition to the R&D portfolio, DHS has already received $885 million in FY 2004 and $2.5 billion in FY 2005 for Project BioShield, a procurement program to purchase biodefense countermeasures that is designed to encourage private-sector biodefense R&D investments. An authorization law establishing program guidelines is expected to be signed into law this summer.

 In March 2003, the new Department of Homeland Security (DHS) took shape with the transfer of nearly 180,000 federal employees in nearly two dozen federal agencies to the new department. All told, the DHS brought together $31 billion worth of programs (FY 2003 budget) in the largest reorganization of the federal government since the 1940s. A year later, the DHS is well on its way to integrating its component agencies and is in the process of setting up numerous programs to address gaps in homeland security, including the creation of new science and technology capabilities to provide the knowledge and technology base for the federal government’s homeland security efforts.

 House Action on the DHS R&D Portfolio

 On June 18, the House of Representatives debated and approved its FY 2005 Homeland Security (HS) appropriations bill (HR 4567), the second of the 13 appropriations bills to make it through the House. The bill funds the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). The House HS bill would provide $1.2 billion for DHS R&D in FY 2005, a dramatic increase of $200 million or 19.3 percent over FY 2004 following an even larger $300 million increase the previous year. The DHS itself requested a substantial increase to $1.1 billion, but the House would add $97 million to the request at a time when other agencies would count themselves lucky to see their R&D budgets keep pace with inflation (see Table).

 R&D in the Directorate of Science and Technology

 Most DHS R&D programs have their home in the Directorate of Science and Technology (S&T), one of five broad directorates in the new department. This Directorate has responsibility for setting homeland-security R&D goals and priorities, coordinating homeland security R&D throughout the federal government, funding homeland security R&D, facilitating the transfer and deployment of technologies for homeland security, and advising the DHS Secretary on all scientific and technical matters.

 In the House plan, the S&T Directorate would fund 86 percent of all DHS R&D (see Table and Figure 1). Nearly all of the $1.1 billion total S&T Directorate budget would go toward R&D activities, except for $69 million in administrative and other overhead costs. The House would add $77 million to the DHS request for S&T R&D programs, for a total of $1.1 billion (up 22.4 percent over FY 2004).

  Figure 1. (click on the image to view or download a color full-size PDF version of the chart)

The House would add to the request for four specific program areas. The House would provide a total of $70 million for University Programs and Fellowship Programs, a boost of $40 million over the request. This program would fund several university-based centers of excellence and would be a funding source dedicated exclusively to funding university-based research. The Department expects to designate several university-based centers for homeland security in FY 2005, adding to the three centers that have already been announced (one on threat assessments and two on agro-terrorism). Universities will not be limited to just $70 million; they will also be able to compete for R&D funds in the other program areas. This program will also fund fellowships that will bring scientists and engineers from academia and private industry to work within the DHS for a year or two. The House would add $10 million in new funds for the Safety Act (included in “Other” in the Table), funds that would be used to certify products as “qualified homeland security technologies” and thus protected from potential liability, in the hopes of encouraging their rapid deployment. The House would provide $21 million in new funds for Interoperability in Communications (see “Other” in the Table) to fund R&D in next-generation communications technologies for public safety wireless communications interoperability. Finally, the House would provide $10 million in new funds for a container security initiative (included in “Conventional Missions” in the Table) to develop new technologies for detecting biological, chemical, radiological, explosive, or nuclear materials in shipping containers.

The largest R&D increase would go to biological countermeasures with a House appropriation of $363 million, up 22.4 percent from FY 2004. The House appropriation does not include a separate $87 million this year and $35 million in FY 2005 for construction of a new laboratory named the National Biodefense Analysis and Countermeasures Center in Fort Detrick, Maryland. Adding in this biodefense laboratory, it becomes clear that biological threats are the top priority in the DHS R&D portfolio (see Figure 1), accounting for nearly a third of all DHS R&D. Within biological countermeasures, the House would agree to the request of $65 million in new funds for a new BioSurveillance initiative program to develop an integrated, real-time, human-animal-plant surveillance system. These new funds would go to the BioWatch program, which has been developing and testing biological detection technologies in major U.S. cities through a network of automated sample collectors. This year and next year, the program will focus on improving these environmental monitoring systems for better accuracy, faster data processing, and adapting these systems for monitoring the U.S. food supply.

 In other areas, the House would stick closely to the request but would move some funds to new accounts. The House bill calls for DHS to spend $61 million for R&D on antimissile devices for commercial aircraft, in the hopes of developing and prototyping of antimissile devices that can be fitted on airplanes (up from $60 million last year, funded through the Critical Infrastructure program). These devices would counter the potential threat from MANPADS (man-portable air defense systems), shoulder-fired missiles that have been used (unsuccessfully so far) against passenger aircraft.  The House would provide $76 million for rapid prototyping activities to assist private industry in rapidly developing and prototyping new homeland security technologies, and would also give $40 million for standards R&D.

 The House would go along with the DHS plan to make significant R&D investments in other areas: $123 million for the development of radiological / nuclear countermeasures (down slightly from $126 million in FY 2004); $63 million for chemical and high explosives countermeasures to protect U.S. civilians against chemical or explosives attacks; $69 million next year for threat and vulnerability assessments to develop technologies to analyze and evaluate threats, with a separate $18 million for cybersecurity R&D broken out from this year’s integrated program; and $21 million for R&D on emerging threats.

Most of the above S&T directorate funds will be spent in federal laboratories or federally funded R&D centers (FFRDCs; government-owned, contractor-operated laboratories). DHS has an Office for National Laboratories that coordinates DHS interactions with DOE national laboratories possessing expertise in homeland security. So far, DHS has relied the most on five DOE laboratories (Los Alamos, Lawrence Livermore, Sandia, Pacific Northwest, and Oak Ridge National Laboratories), which have set up lab-within-a-lab structures to allow a core of laboratory employees to work primarily for DHS with DHS funds while still drawing on the resources of their DOE-funded colleagues. Recently, DHS set up its own FFRDC, a new Homeland Security Institute (HSI). Most extramural R&D will be handled by the Homeland Security Advanced Research Projects Agency (HSARPA), which will manage competitive solicitations for R&D grants to external performers, cutting across all the homeland security technology areas.

 R&D in Other DHS Directorates and Programs

 - Directorate of Border and Transportation Security: The remaining $174 million in DHS R&D outside the S&T Directorate would be funded by the Transportation Security Administration (TSA), located within this directorate (see Table). TSA’s R&D on aviation security would rise $20 million to $174 million in the House plan, of which the additional $20 million (for a total of $75 million) would go to air cargo security R&D, $49 million would go to various R&D program areas at TSA’s Technology Center, and $50 million would go for ‘next-generation’ R&D on promising explosive detection technologies for commercial aviation.

 - Directorate of Emergency Preparedness and Response: This directorate coordinates all federal assistance in response to disasters (including natural disasters) and domestic attacks, and folds in the former Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). There are no R&D programs within this directorate.

 Within this directorate, there is $5.6 billion over the next 10 years to procure biodefense countermeasures from the private sector, which could provide strong incentives for private-sector investments in biodefense R&D. The FY 2004 DHS appropriation provided $885 million in FY 2004 and an additional $4.7 billion between 2005 and 2013 for the program named Project BioShield in the President’s State of the Union address. $2.5 billion of this money will become available in FY 2005 without any further action by Congress, of which DHS plans to sign contracts for $890 million in FY 2005 to follow on $885 million in contracts this year. The House HS bill makes no changes to this plan. Although not an R&D program, the program is designed to encourage private-sector R&D investments in biodefense vaccines, therapeutics, and other countermeasures by providing a guaranteed government market for future products. The directorate will purchase and stockpile these countermeasures using the $5.6 billion total appropriation, but the management of the program, including the selection of eligible countermeasures, will be handled by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). The final operating procedures and details of this program will be decided by an authorization law, which is currently before Congress but could be signed into law this summer.

 - Directorate of Information Analysis and Infrastructure Protection (IAIP): There would be no R&D funding in the $864 million budget for this directorate, but IAIP would collaborate with the S&T directorate in the Bio-Surveillance initiative (see above). The S&T Directorate would assist this directorate’s activities with R&D funded through its Cybersecurity and Critical Infrastructure programs (see Table).

 - Coast Guard: The Coast Guard, formerly in the Department of Transportation, is now housed in DHS. Its R&D portfolio totals $14 million in FY 2004, but beginning in FY 2005 its R&D needs will be handled by the S&T Directorate under the line item “Conventional Missions of DHS” (see Table; $68 million in the House bill).

 Next Steps

The House Homeland Security bill awaits a companion bill from the Senate. The Senate version of the bill may be on the Senate floor the week of June 21. Early accounts indicate that the Senate allocations of DHS R&D will be similar to the House. The AAAS R&D Funding Update on Senate DHS R&D will be available the week of June 21.

- June 18, 2004

(This analysis is one of a series of AAAS R&D Funding Updates on FY 2005 congressional appropriations. The complete series of AAAS R&D Funding Updates, including continually updated analyses of R&D by agency in FY 2005 appropriations, is available on the AAAS R&D Web Site (http://www.aaas.org/spp/rd) in the "FY 2005 R&D" or the "What's New" sections.)

AAAS R&D Budget and Policy Program
1200 New York Ave, NW
Washington, DC 20005
(202) 326-6607; -6600
www.aaas.org/spp/rd    

Table. Department of Homeland Security

 

 

 

 

 

House Appropriations Committee Action on R&D in the FY 2005 Budget

 

 

(budget authority in millions of dollars)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Action by House

 

FY 2004

FY 2005

FY 2005

Chg. from Request

Chg. from FY 2004

 

Estimate*

Request*

House

Amount

Percent

Amount

Percent

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

DHS R&D:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Border & Transportation Security (TSA)*

154

154

174

20

13.0%

20

12.8%

Emergency Preparedness

0

0

0

0

- -  

0

- -  

Information Analysis and Infra.

0

0

0

0

- -  

0

- -  

Science and Technology

869

987

1,064

77

7.8%

195

22.4%

Biological countermeasures

197

407

363

-44

-10.9%

165

83.8%

Chemical & High Explosives

61

63

63

0

0.0%

2

2.6%

Radiological & Nuclear

126

129

123

-7

-5.2%

-4

-2.9%

Threat & vulnerability assessments ^^

93

102

69

-33

-32.4%

-24

-25.9%

Standards / state and local

39

40

40

0

0.0%

1

2.4%

Critical infrastructure ^

66

61

27

-34

-55.7%

-39

-59.2%

University programs / HS fellowships

70

30

70

40

133.3%

0

0.6%

Emerging threats

21

21

21

0

0.0%

0

0.6%

Rapid Prototyping

75

76

76

0

0.0%

1

1.9%

Anti-aircraft missiles ^

0

0

61

61

- -  

61

- -  

Conventional Missions of DHS **

34

58

68

10

17.2%

34

101.6%

NBACC ***

87

0

35

35

- -  

-52

-60.0%

Cyber security ^^

0

0

18

18

- -  

18

- -  

Other

0

0

31

31

- -  

31

- -  

Coast Guard **

14

0

0

0

- -  

-14

-100.0%

 

_______

_______

_______

_______

 

_______

_______

  Total DHS R&D

1,037

1,141

1,238

97

8.5%

200

19.3%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Selected non-R&D items:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Biodefense countermeasures (BioShield)

885

2,528

2,528

0

0.0%

1,643

185.6%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total DHS Discretionary Budget

29,242

31,104

32,000

895

2.9%

2,758

9.4%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

AAAS estimates based on FY 2005 appropriations bills.  Includes conduct of R&D and R&D facilities.

 

 

FY 2004 and FY 2005 request figures based on OMB R&D data and supplemental agency budget data.

 

 

Figures are rounded to the nearest million. Changes calculated from unrounded figures.

 

 

 

BioShield funding has already been provided in FY 2005 advance appropriations.

 

 

 

* - TSA R&D figures for FY 2004 and FY 2005 request have been revised since the February release of the budget.

 

** - Coast Guard R&D transfers to S&T Directorate (Conventional Missions) in FY 2005.

 

 

 

*** - National Biodefense Analysis and Countermeasures Center construction. FY 2005 request includes these costs in Biological

       Countermeasures.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

^ - The House creates a new account for Counter MANPADS. In Critical Infrastructure in FY 2004 and FY 2005 request.

^^ - The House creates a new account for cybersecurity. In Threat & Vulnerability Assessments in FY 2004 and FY 2005 request.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

June 18, 2004 - AAAS estimates of House Appropriations Committee-approved funding levels.

 

These funding levels may be amended or rejected by the full House.

 

 

 

 


American Association for the Advancement of Science