American Association for the Advancement of Science

AAAS R&D Funding Update on R&D in DHS FY 2007 Conference Appropriations -


DHS R&D Falls for the First Time in 2007

Go to:

-Table. Dept. of Homeland Security R&D in FY 2007 Conference Appropriations

PDF version of this document

Main R&D in the FY 2007 Budget Page

Supplemental Materials:

"Senate Cuts DHS R&D," AAAS R&D Funding Update on DHS R&D in FY 2007 Senate Appropriations

"DHS R&D Falls Steeply In House Plan," AAAS R&D Funding Update on DHS R&D in FY 2007 House Appropriations

"DHS R&D Falls in 2007 Budget," AAAS R&D Funding Update on R&D in the FY 2007 DHS Budget

AAAS Analysis of R&D in the FY 2007 Budget

 

 

- Congress recently finalized an FY 2007 Homeland Security appropriations bill that would cut the Department of Homeland Security’s (DHS) R&D funding for the first time in 2007. DHS R&D would fall 22 percent to $1.0 billion even as the total DHS budget would keep increasing. Funding for most DHS R&D activities would decline. Only DHS R&D activities in cybersecurity, interoperable communications, and radiological and nuclear countermeasures would receive increases in 2007.

 - The radiological and nuclear countermeasures R&D portfolio would receive a significant increase as part of its move from the Science and Technology directorate to a separate Domestic Nuclear Detection Office (DNDO) in 2007. Congress boosts DNDO R&D from $209 million within S&T to $273 million, a boost of 31 percent.

 - Congressional dissatisfaction over DHS management continues to grow. The final DHS budget withholds $65 million in 2007 R&D funds (and an additional $60 million in management funds) until DHS provides Congress with detailed reports on financial management and performance measures. The bill also rescinds $125 million in previously appropriated R&D funds that DHS has not spent yet.

 

Figure 1. (click on the image for PDF)

- University and Fellowship Programs funding would drop $12 million to $50 million in 2007. The final DHS bill leaves out a Senate provision limiting DHS university centers to three years of federal support.

DHS R&D in FY 2007 House-Senate Conference Appropriations

On September 29, the House and Senate gave final approval to the conference report (final version) of the FY 2007 Homeland Security appropriations bill (HR 5441), which funds the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). President Bush is expected to the sign the bill into law shortly. The DHS budget continues to be a high priority for the Bush Administration and for Congress, but it is a different story for the DHS R&D portfolio: after starting from virtually nothing three years ago and rapidly ramping up to become the seventh-largest agency R&D portfolio, DHS R&D in FY 2007 would fall for the first time, by 21.7 percent or $278 million to $1.0 billion (see Table and Figure 1). Funding for nearly every part of DHS’ broad portfolio of R&D activities would fall. (For details of the President’s request for DHS R&D, please see Chapter 12 of AAAS Report XXXI: R&D FY 2007 or the February 28 DHS R&D Funding Update. For details of Senate appropriations, see the July 6 Update; for House appropriations, see the May 31 Update.)

After a 2006 budget in which there were ups and downs for the first time in the R&D portfolio after nothing but ups in the first few years, the cuts would far outnumber the increases in 2007 (see Table and Figure 3). Other than a large increase for radiological / nuclear countermeasures, only the cybersecurity (up $3 million to $20 million) and interoperable communications portfolios (up $1 million to $27 million) would increase in 2007 (see Table). All other DHS R&D areas would see cuts in 2007; the apparent increase in R&D for DHS Agencies would be due to transfers from the R&D Consolidation account, and the apparent increase in explosives R&D is due to the transfer of TSA R&D into the account in 2007. The Counter MANPADS portfolio would plummet from $109 million down to $40 million, primarily because the development phase of this project would end in 2006 with the production of prototypes. Man Portable Air Defense Systems (MANPADS) are shoulder-mounted portable air missiles that have been used (unsuccessfully so far) against passenger aircraft.

 

Figure 2. (click on the image for PDF)

Within the diminishing total, R&D against weapons of mass destruction dominates the DHS R&D portfolio (see Figure 2). Defenses against biological, chemical, explosive, radiological, and nuclear threats continue to make up nearly three-quarters of the R&D investment, but of these areas only the radiological and nuclear R&D portfolio would increase in 2007.

 Biological countermeasures would continue to be the largest portfolio with $350 million, down 7 percent from 2006. DHS’ biodefense effort works with the Department of Defense (DOD), the National Institutes of Health (NIH), the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) and other agencies. Construction of the National Biodefense Analysis and Countermeasures Center (NBACC) continues in FY 2006 and 2007 toward a target completion date of 2008. NBACC will be part of a biodefense complex of DHS, NIH, and DOD facilities at Fort Detrick, Maryland; groundbreaking on the facility took place over the summer. Congress would also reduce the Chemical Countermeasures R&D portfolio to $60 million, 36 percent below last year, despite increasing congressional concern over the vulnerability of chemical plants or transported chemicals to terrorist attacks.

 

Figure 3. (click on the image for PDF)

 Funding for University and Fellowship Programs would fall $12 million to $50 million in 2007, after a similar cut in 2006. But Congress has noted that this program has not yet obligated as much as $68 million in previously appropriated funds, so that the cut should have less impact than at first glance. This program funds university-based Centers of Excellence that are multi-year university consortia to perform R&D on homeland security-related topics, Cooperative Centers that are multi-agency university centers, and also fellowships to encourage U.S. students to pursue scientific and technical degrees in areas of study related to homeland security. There are now five DHS Centers of Excellence, the latest awarded in December 2005 to Johns Hopkins University and partners for the National Center for the Study of Preparedness and Catastrophic Event Response. The FY 2007 appropriation would continue funding for these centers and would leave open the possibility of a sixth center. But the declining budget would not allow for any more university centers, stopping short of the up to 10 centers envisioned three years ago when DHS was founded. On the fellowships side, DHS would support 200 students and scholars (down significantly from 300 this year), and also up to ten postdoctoral fellows and up to five AAAS fellows to participate in DHS research with the resources provided in FY 2007.

 The final DHS appropriation does not contain language from the Senate version of the bill limiting DHS centers to three years of federal support.

 In 2006, nearly all DHS R&D programs had their home in the Directorate of Science and Technology (S&T) after several years of consolidation, but Congress and DHS are now undoing this consolidation because of disenchantment with the directorate’s performance so far. The S&T Directorate has responsibility for setting homeland-security R&D goals and priorities, coordinating homeland security R&D throughout the federal government, funding homeland security R&D, facilitating the transfer and deployment of technologies for homeland security, and advising the DHS Secretary on all scientific and technical matters. In 2006, only Coast Guard (CG) R&D remained separate within the Coast Guard appropriation at $19 million. But in 2007, the consolidation would reverse as the radiological and nuclear countermeasures portfolio migrates out of S&T to a separate Domestic Nuclear Detection Office (DNDO). The Senate would have gone further by also moving most of the explosives countermeasures portfolio out of S&T back to where it came from, the Transportation Security Administration (TSA), but the final bill keeps this portfolio within S&T.

 The Domestic Nuclear Detection Office (DNDO), which funds the radiological and nuclear countermeasures portfolio, begins operations in 2006 within the S&T Directorate, but moves to a separate budget account in 2007. The DNDO will develop, acquire, and support a domestic system to detect and report terrorist attempts to transport or use radiological or nuclear materials. The total DNDO budget of $334 million in 2006 would increase dramatically to $481 million in 2007. Subtracting procurement and management funding leaves $273 million for DNDO R&D, up from $209 million in 2006 for comparable programs and just $123 million the year before. Included in the 2007 increase is a new $9 million DNDO university research program. Both the House and the Senate have expressed their concerns about the effectiveness of this new organization and criticized DHS for not providing enough information about how the Office will effectively perform its missions, in particular how DNDO will coordinate with the many other government agencies both inside and outside DHS that will ultimately implement radiological and nuclear detection systems at U.S. ports of entry and other locations. The final Homeland Security bill withholds $15 million in R&D funds until DNDO signs memoranda of understanding with all other federal agencies involved in radiological and nuclear materials outlining clearly each agency’s roles and responsibilities with respect to DNDO.  

 Congress leaves just $713 million in R&D for the S&T Directorate to manage in 2007, little more than half the $1.3 billion the directorate had in 2006. In earlier versions of the bill, Congress had described the directorate as “a rudderless ship without a clear way to get back on course” criticized its lack of clear research goals, absence of detailed budget information, mystifying accounting conventions, and even an inability to spend past appropriations it has been given. The final bill rescinds $125 million previously appropriated R&D funds that have never been obligated, and requires S&T to submit a five-year research plan with priorities, performance measures, and resource needs for each R&D area before it can spend a $60 million chunk of its 2007 R&D funds. Congress separately withholds $60 million in S&T management costs funding until a detailed accounting of overhead and management costs for the R&D portfolio is delivered.

 DHS R&D gets its first earmark in 2007 with an unrequested $2 million appropriation for radiological laboratories at the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory in Washington. The DHS R&D portfolio had been earmark-free since the department’s founding.

 Outlook and Next Steps

 President Bush is expected to sign the Homeland Security bill into law shortly. DHS becomes only the second R&D funding agency (after the Department of Defense) to receive its final FY 2007 appropriation.  

 DHS R&D, after a rapid ramp-up phase, now appears to be a mature R&D portfolio and subject like other R&D funding agencies to cuts because of the tight budget situation facing domestic programs. As shown in Figure 1, DHS began life with only a few R&D laboratories and programs that it inherited from USDA, DOE, and DOD, unlike the massive transfer of personnel and capabilities that happened in the rest of the new department. From a transfer of less than $300 million of programs in 2002, DHS began rapidly creating new R&D capabilities after its foundation in FY 2003 (see Figure 1), adding portfolios on long-neglected technology areas to address homeland security, establishing relationships with existing national laboratories and federal laboratories, and setting up new structures for funding external R&D. But after DHS finished its start-up phase in 2005, budget growth slowed down in 2006 and reverses in 2007 (see Figure 1) amid growing concern that the budget has grown far faster than the department’s ability to spend its money wisely. Now, only the radiological and nuclear countermeasures portfolio remains a growth area (see Figure 3).

(This analysis is one of a series of AAAS R&D Funding Updates on FY 2007 congressional appropriations. The complete series of AAAS R&D Funding Updates, including continually updated analyses of R&D in FY 2007 appropriations, is available on the AAAS R&D Web Site (http://www.aaas.org/spp/rd) in the “FY 2007 R&D” or the “What’s New” sections.)

- October 2, 2006
AAAS R&D Budget and Policy Program
1200 New York Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20005
(202) 326-6607
AAAS R&D Web site: http://www.aaas.org/spp/rd


Table. Department of Homeland Security

 

 

 

 

 

House-Senate Conference on R&D in the FY 2007 Budget

 

 

 

(budget authority in millions of dollars)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

House-Senate Conference

 

FY 2006

FY 2007

FY 2007

Chg. from Request

Chg. from FY 2006

 

Estimate

Request

CONF.

Amount

Percent

Amount

Percent

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

DHS R&D:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Border & Transp. Security (TSA) 1/

0

0

0

0

- -  

0

- -  

Domestic Nuclear Detection Office 2/ 4/

0

328

273

-56

-16.9%

273

- -  

Science and Technology

1,262

806

713

-93

-11.5%

-549

-43.5%

- Biological Countermeasures

376

337

350

13

3.9%

-26

-6.9%

- Chemical Countermeasures

94

83

60

-23

-27.8%

-34

-36.2%

- Explosives Countermeasures 1/

44

87

87

0

0.0%

43

98.8%

- Radiological & Nuclear Ctrmeas. 2/ 4/

209

0

0

0

- -  

-209

-100.0%

- Threat Awareness

43

40

35

-5

-12.2%

-8

-17.8%

- Standards

35

22

22

0

0.0%

-13

-36.1%

- R&D for DHS Agencies

79

89

86

-3

-3.4%

6

8.1%

- University & Fellowship

62

52

50

-2

-3.8%

-12

-19.8%

- Emerging & Prototypical Tech. 3/

43

19

19

0

0.0%

-23

-54.3%

- Counter MANPADS

109

5

40

35

719.7%

-69

-63.3%

- SAFETY Act

7

5

5

0

0.0%

-2

-32.0%

- Interoperable Communic.

26

30

27

-3

-9.2%

1

2.9%

- Critical Infrastructure

40

15

35

20

129.8%

-5

-12.3%

- Cybersecurity

17

23

20

-3

-12.0%

3

21.0%

- R&D Consolidation 1/

99

0

0

0

- -  

-99

-100.0%

- BA Adjustment 5/

-20

0

-125

-125

- -  

-105

- -   

- Pacific NW Laboratory

0

0

2

2

- -  

2

- -  

Coast Guard

19

15

17

2

- -  

-2

-10.5%

 

_______

_______

_______

_______

 

_______

 

  Total DHS R&D

1,281

1,149

1,003

-146

-12.7%

-278

-21.7%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

AAAS estimates based on FY 2007 appropriations bills.  Includes conduct of R&D and R&D facilities.

 

 

FY 2006 and FY 2007 request figures based on OMB R&D data and supplemental agency budget data.

 

 

Figures are rounded to the nearest million. Changes calculated from unrounded figures.

 

 

 

BioShield funding has already been provided in advance appropriations.

 

 

 

 

1/ FY 2006 budget consolidated TSA R&D within S&T Directorate. In FY 2007, these funds move to Explosives Countermeasures.

2/ Rad. & Nuc. Countermeasures transfer to the Domestic Nuclear Detection Office in 2007.

 

 

 

3/ Consolidates Rapid Prototyping and Emerging Threats programs beginning in 2007.

 

 

 

4/ R&D items only. Non-R&D components and line items are excluded.

 

 

 

 

5/ FY 2007 Conference includes $125 million undistributed rescission of previous appropriated funds.

 

 

October 2, 2006 - AAAS estimates of House-Senate conference report of HS appropriations bill.

 

These figures are final unless the conference report is rejected or vetoed.

 

 

 

  

American Association for the Advancement of Science