American Association for the Advancement of Science

AAAS R&D Funding Update on R&D in the FY 2008 NSF Budget -


NSF Gains for the 2nd Year in 2008 Budget

Go to:

-Table II-7. R&D in the National Science Foundation

PDF version of this document

Supplemental Materials:

AAAS Analysis of R&D in the FY 2008 Budget

- - Chart. NSF Budget, 2000-2008 (2/07)

- - Chart. NSF Budget by Directorate, 2000-2008 (2/07)

 

(This analysis is a preview of the NSF chapter in the forthcoming AAAS Report XXXII: Research and Development FY 2008, a comprehensive look at the President's budget for R&D in FY 2008. This analysis contains revised AAAS estimates of NSF R&D, different from figures originally presented in the President's budget. More tables and continually updated supplemental materials on R&D in the FY 2008 budget can be found on the AAAS R&D Web site at http://www.aaas.org/spp/rd.)

Highlights 

- The National Science Foundation (NSF) benefits from the second year of the Bush Administration’s American Competitiveness Initiative (ACI) with an 8.7 percent boost in its total budget to $6.4 billion in 2008, after a recently finalized similar boost in 2007 (see Table II-7).  Most research directorates would receive increases between 4 and 9 percent for the second year in a row.

 - NSF R&D investments (excluding education, training, and overhead costs) would total $4.9 billion, an 8.3 percent increase to an all-time high in real terms.

 - All the research directorates would increase average award sizes, numbers of research grants, and success rates for research grant applications in 2008.

 - NSF’s Education and Human Resources (E.H.R.) budget would increase 7.5 percent to $751 million in 2008 after remaining flat in 2007, but would remain 19 percent below the 2004 funding level in real terms.

 NSF R&D in the FY 2008 Budget

 Over a year ago, President Bush announced in his FY 2007 budget a proposal to substantially increase funding for key physical sciences research agencies over ten years as part of an “American Competitiveness Initiative” (ACI), designed in part to address a growing wave of concern about the state of U.S. innovation. The National Science Foundation (NSF) was one of three ACI agencies (the others are the DOE Office of Science, and the National Institute of Standards and Technology laboratories) favored with a requested increase of 8 percent for its budget, but because of congressional delays in wrapping up 2007 appropriations NSF only received its final 2007 budget last week on February 15, 4 ½ months into the fiscal year. NSF received most of what it asked for, the requested increases for its research programs but flat funding for its facilities construction and education and human resources programs.

The FY 2008 NSF budget, already released earlier this month, builds on the first year of the ACI with a second year of increases for most programs. The total NSF budget of $6.4 billion in 2008 would be $513 million or 8.7 percent more than the final 2007 funding level. (All figures in this analysis reflect final 2007 appropriations as signed into law on February 15.) The increases would go not only to NSF’s investment in the physical sciences but across the entire NSF research portfolio, which spans the entire range of science and engineering disciplines. NSF is the third-largest federal sponsor of physical sciences research, after DOE and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), but is among the top 3 federal funding agencies for nearly every science and engineering discipline. NSF is the second largest funding source for R&D at colleges and universities, behind only the National Institutes of Health (NIH), and provides the majority of federal support for basic research at colleges and universities in the social sciences, environmental sciences, non-medical biology, mathematics, and computer sciences. For the physical sciences and engineering, NSF funds more than 40 percent of all federally supported academic basic research. Thus, the broad-based increases in 2007 and 2008 would have a major impact on nearly all science and engineering disciplines, especially at universities.

After adjusting for inflation, the 2008 increase would enable NSF funding to narrowly reach an all-time high (see Figure 1). After peaking in 2004, NSF funding fell in 2005 and 2006 but would rise for the second year in a row in 2008.


Figure 1. (click on the image for PDF)

 NSF’s R&D funding, which excludes NSF’s education and training activities and overhead costs (such as polar logistics and administrative salaries), would total $4.9 billion, a gain of $374 million or 8.3 percent over the final 2007 appropriation that would bring the R&D total slightly above 2004 in inflation-adjusted terms (see Figure 1), after cuts in 2005 and 2006 and a rebound in 2007.

NSF’s main Research and Related Activities (R&RA) account, which funds nearly all of NSF’s basic and applied research and contains NSF’s discipline-based research directorates, would climb 7.7 percent to $5.1 billion (see Table II-7). Most research directorates would receive increases between 4 and 9 percent for the second year in a row after several years of flat or declining funding (see Figure 2). There would be larger increases for some key programs: the new Office of Cyberinfrastructure (OCI), a recent spin-off from the Computer and Information Science and Engineering (CISE) directorate, would see its funding climb 9.6 percent to $200 million. OCI supports the procurement, development, and operation of state-of-the-art cyberinfrastructure resources for the entire research community. Its sister CISE directorate would gain 9.0 percent. OCI and CISE would take the lead in a new Cyber-enabled Discovery and Innovation (CDI) initiative to develop computationally based concepts and tools to deal with complex systems. The Mathematical and Physical Sciences (MPS) and Engineering (ENG), strong supporters along with CISE and OCI of the physical sciences broadly defined that are the ACI’s focus, would gain 8.9 percent and 8.7 percent, respectively. Moving away from the physical sciences, the gains become smaller, dropping to 6.3 percent for the Geosciences (GEO) directorate (to $792 million) down to modest increases for the Biological Sciences (BIO) directorate (up 4.1 percent) and Social, Behavioral, and Economic Sciences (SBE; up 3.9 percent).

Within R&RA, the Integrative Activities (IA) account would climb 14.6 percent to $263 million, primarily from a $24 million or 27.2 percent increase in Major Research Instrumentation (MRI), a program to distribute competitively awarded instrumentation grants to institutions for state-of-the-art research instrumentation that would be too costly to be funded through regular NSF research awards. The Experimental Program to Stimulate Competitive Research (EPSCoR) would move to IA and receive $107 million, up $7 million. EPSCOR assists research institutions and states that have traditionally been underrepresented in federal R&D funding to build research capacity. The program is currently open to 24 states, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands; collectively, the EPSCoR states received just 10.4 percent of NSF R&D funds in FY 2004.


Figure 2. (click on the image for PDF) 

The Office of Polar Programs (OPP), which funds polar research but also provides logistical support for research activities at both poles and maintains the South Pole Station, would receive $465 million, a boost of 6.1 percent. The OPP increase would build on a larger increase in 2007 to ramp up research during the International Polar Year (2007-2008) and for increased logistics costs to support that research. Away from the poles, NSF would invest a new $17 million in oceans research in GEO to address important issues in ocean research identified recently by a multi-agency Ocean Research Priorities Plan. 

Even after the substantial 2007 and 2008 increases, funding for several research directorates would remain below 2004 levels in real terms because of budget cuts in 2005 and 2006 (see Figure 2). In real terms, funding for the Geosciences (GEO) and Biological Sciences (BIO) would remain below 2004 levels, while the computer sciences, social sciences, mathematics and physical sciences, polar, and engineering directorates would reach new highs, though just narrowly.

 The Major Research Equipment and Facilities Construction (MREFC) account would receive a $54 million boost to $245 million in 2008 to fund 7 projects (see Table II-7). A similar proposed boost in 2007 became flat funding in the final 2007 appropriation. MREFC funds only the construction of large scientific facilities; smaller facilities projects, planning and design for future facilities, research instrumentation grants, and facilities operations are funded in R&RA by the research directorates. Although final plans for 2007 have not been announced, NSF will try to initiate three projects in 2007 (the Ocean Observatories Initiative, the National Ecological Observatory Network, and the Alaska Region Research Vessel) if sufficient funds are available. In 2008, NSF would start the Advanced Laser Interferometer Gravitational Wave Observatory (AdvLIGO), an upgrade to the existing LIGO in Washington and West Virginia of the world’s most sophisticated optical interferometers, with a $33 million allocation.

NSF education and human resources programs would increase $52 million or 7.5 percent to $751 million, but would remain 19 percent below 2004 levels in real terms after steep cuts in 2005 and 2006 and flat funding in 2007 (see Figure 2). In a reversal of past budgets, NSF would sustain the Math and Science Partnerships (MSP) program as a joint Department of Education (ED)-NSF program after seeking to transition the program to an Education-only one in previous years. The NSF contribution was $139 million in 2004 but has declined steadily since then and declined further to just $46 million in 2007; the 2008 request would stay at $46 million, but would allow $30 million for new grants. The ED portion of the program remains at $182 million in 2008.

Through its research directorates, NSF would expand its participation in several multi-agency initiatives in 2008. NSF’s contribution as the lead agency in the National Nanotechnology Initiative would climb 4.6 percent to $390 million in 2008, with major funding split between ENG and MPS. NSF is also the lead agency in the Networking and Information Technology R&D (NITRD) initiative; NSF’s contribution would jump 10.0 percent to $994 million, with the majority of support coming from CISE and OCI. NSF also participates in the Climate Change Science Program (CCSP) with a $208 million contribution (up 1.5 percent), mostly from GEO.

NSF Funding Mechanisms

The large proposed increases for the research directorates would mean a second year of gains to reverse recent declines in competitively awarded research grants. Looking only at competitively awarded research grants, NSF’s core funding mechanism, NSF expects to fund 7,435 research grants next year, an 8 percent increase, while at the same time increasing the average award size to $147,200 (up 3.0 percent) after several years of flat funding. After several years of declining success rates, NSF projects that it will fund 21 percent of research grant proposals, up slightly from 20 percent in 2007. The broad-based increases would allow every research directorate (excluding the new OCI) to increase the three key measures of the number of research grants, the average grant size, and the projected success rate.

NSF Research Portfolio and Performers

NSF is the only federal agency with responsibility for research in all major science and engineering fields. NSF has a balanced research portfolio covering the breadth of science and engineering, with roughly equal shares for the broad disciplinary groupings of physical sciences, environmental sciences, engineering, and mathematics/computer sciences, followed closely by biological sciences. In most fields, NSF is the largest or second-largest source of federal funding.


Figure 3. (click on the image for PDF)

The FY 2007 and proposed FY 2008 increases should benefit NSF support for most science and engineering disciplines after cuts in 2005 and 2006 (see Figure 3, with data through 2006 only). In the past, NSF has distributed its increases unevenly depending on then-current research priorities. In particular, NSF support for computer sciences research has increased dramatically over the past decade, as fundamental IT research has grown as a national priority. NSF support of engineering research has also grown substantially over the last decade because of the growth in IT and nanotechnology research. The 2007 and 2008 budgets, with their relatively evenly distributed increases, should bring funding for most disciplines in Figure 3 above or near their 2004 peak funding levels.

NSF’s longstanding leadership role in federal support of basic research continues to have a big impact on the nation’s colleges and universities. NSF sends 79 percent of its R&D support to colleges and universities, by far the highest ratio of any R&D funding agency. NSF is the second-largest federal supporter of academic R&D, behind the National Institutes of Health (NIH), and dominates federal support in most non-biomedical fields.

Outlook for the NSF Budget

 The 2008 NSF budget now goes to the 110th Congress, which just this month endorsed a large increase for the agency in the joint funding resolution that wrapped up 2007 appropriations. The delayed but ultimately positive 2007 appropriations cycle for NSF portends well for another substantial increase for NSF in 2008. Now that both the Bush Administration and the Congress have expressed support for the ACI, the outlook for sustained increases for NSF next year and in future years is the brightest it has been in a decade.

(More materials on R&D in the FY 2008 budget, historical data and charts, and more information on AAAS Report XXXII: Research and Development FY 2008, can be found on the AAAS R&D Web site at http://www.aaas.org/spp/rd.)

- February 21, 2007
AAAS R&D Budget and Policy Program
1200 New York Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20005
(202) 326-6607
AAAS R&D Web site: http://www.aaas.org/spp/rd


Table II-7. R&D in the National Science Foundation

 

 

 

(budget authority in millions of dollars) *

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

FY 2006

FY 2007

FY 2008

Change FY 07-08

 

Actual

Estimate**

Budget

Amount

Percent

 

 

 

 

 

 

1. Research and Related Activities (R&RA)

 

 

 

 

Mathematical and Physical Sciences (MPS)

 

 

 

 

       Astronomical Sciences

200

215

233

18

8.3%

       Chemistry

181

191

211

19

10.2%

       Materials Research

243

257

283

25

9.8%

       Mathematical Sciences

200

206

223

18

8.6%

       Physics

234

249

269

21

8.3%

       Multidisciplinary Activities

30

32

34

2

6.1%

 

______

______

______

 

 

          Total MPS

1,087

1,150

1,253

103

8.9%

 

 

 

 

 

 

Engineering (ENG)

 

 

 

 

 

    Chem, Bioeng, Env & Transport

125

124

145

21

16.5%

    Civil, Mechanical & Manuf. Innov

149

152

174

22

14.4%

    Electrical Commun & Cyber Sys.

78

81

94

13

16.1%

    Industrial Innovation Partnersh.

110

120

128

8

6.9%

      - SBIR/ STTR

99

109

116

8

6.9%

    Engineering Edu. & Centers

124

126

117

-9

-7.2%

   Emerging Frontiers in Res. Innov

0

25

25

0

0.0%

 

______

______

______

 

 

          Total ENG

585

629

683

55

8.7%

 

 

 

 

 

 

Biological Sciences (BIO)

 

 

 

 

 

       Molecular and Cellular Bioscis.

108

111

116

5

4.6%

       Integrative Organismal Sys.

101

101

105

5

4.7%

       Environmental Biology

107

110

115

5

4.6%

       Biological Infrastructure

82

86

96

10

11.9%

       Emerging Frontiers

82

99

99

0

0.0%

       Plant Genome Research

101

101

101

0

0.0%

 

______

______

______

 

 

          Total BIO

581

608

633

25

4.1%

 

 

 

 

 

 

Geosciences (GEO)

 

 

 

 

 

       Atmospheric Sciences

216

227

241

14

6.2%

       Earth Sciences

140

152

163

11

7.2%

       Innov. & Collab. Edu. & Res.

58

59

59

0

0.0%

       Ocean Sciences

289

307

329

22

7.2%

 

______

______

______

 

 

          Total GEO

704

745

792

47

6.3%

 

 

 

 

 

 

Computer and Information Science and Engineering (CISE)

 

 

     Computing & Communic. Foun.

105

123

149

26

21.4%

     Computer & Network Sys.

141

163

192

29

17.8%

     Info. & Intelligent Sys.

104

119

155

35

29.6%

    Information Tech. Research

146

122

78

-43

-35.7%

 

______

______

______

 

 

          Total CISE

496

527

574

47

9.0%

 

 

 

 

 

 

Office of Cyberinfrastructure

127

182

200

18

9.6%

 

 

 

 

 

 

Social, Behavioral, and Economic Sciences (SBE)

 

 

 

       Social & Economic Scis.

94

100

103

3

3.5%

       Behavioral & Cognitive Scis.

81

84

88

4

4.2%

       Science Resources Statistics

27

30

31

1

4.3%

  

______

______

______

 

 

          Total SBE

201

214

222

8

3.9%

Office of International Sci & Eng

43

41

45

4

10.8%

US Polar Programs

 

 

 

 

 

       Arctic Sciences

74

90

96

7

7.5%

       Antarctic Sciences

48

57

64

8

13.2%

       Antarctic Infra. & Logistics

203

229

241

12

5.3%

       Polar Env., Safety & Health

5

6

6

1

9.5%

       Polar Icebreaking 1/

60

57

57

0

0.0%

 

______

______

______

 

 

          Total Polar Programs

391

438

465

27

6.1%

 

 

 

 

 

 

Integrative Activities 2/

233

230

263

33

14.6%

      - EPSCoR 2/ 4/

98

100

107

7

7.0%

      - Major Res. Instrumentation

88

90

114

24

27.2%

Arctic Research Commission

1

1

1

0

2.8%

BA Adjustment *

-12

0

0

0

- -  

 

______

______

______

 

 

          Total R&RA *

4,437

4,764

5,132

368

7.7%

 

 

 

 

 

 

2. Major Research Equip. & Facils.

191

191

245

54

28.2%

 

 

 

 

 

 

3. Education & Human Resources (EHR) 3/

 

 

 

 

     Research on Learning in Formal

 

 

 

 

        and Informal Settings

216

216

223

7

3.2%

     Undergraduate Education

212

212

210

-2

-0.8%

     Graduate Education

153

153

170

16

10.7%

     Human Resource Develop.

120

120

148

29

23.9%

     BA Adjustment *

-2

-2

0

2

- -  

 

______

______

______

 

 

          Total EHR

698

698

751

52

7.5%

 

 

 

 

 

 

4. Agency Ops. & Award Mgmt. 5/

247

247

286

39

15.7%

5. National Science Board

4

4

4

0

2.0%

6. Inspector General

11

11

12

1

8.8%

 

______

______

______

 

 

     Total NSF Budget *

5,589

5,916

6,429

513

8.7%

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deduct non-R&D Activities:

 

 

 

 

 

R&RA non-R&D

-508

-536

-590

54

10.1%

EHR non-R&D

-635

-635

-681

46

7.2%

Agency Ops. & Award Mngmt.

-247

-247

-286

39

15.7%

National Science Board

-4

-4

-4

0

2.0%

Inspector General

-11

-11

-12

1

8.8%

 

______

______

______

 

 

      Total NSF R&D

4,183

4,482

4,856

374

8.3%

 

 

 

 

 

 

Conduct of R&D

3,777

4,058

4,358

300

7.4%

R&D Facilities

406

424

498

73

17.3%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Source: NSF budget justification and Quantitative Data Tables.

 

 

* - Directorate detailed figures are in obligations. BA adjustment converts

 

    obligations to budget authority.

 

 

 

 

 

** - FY 2007 figures are estimates of final FY 2007 appropriations in Public Law 110-5.

 1/ Transfer to Coast Guard for polar icebreaking costs.

 

 

 

 2/  Includes proposed transfer of EPSCOR program from E.H.R. to R&RA in all years.

 3/ FY 2008 budget proposes to restructure E.H.R. accounts.

 

 

    All years shown in proposed new structure for comparability.

 

 

 4/ Experimental Program to Stimulate Competitive Research.

 

 

 5/ Formerly Salaries and Expenses.

 

 

 

 

AAAS - February 21, 2007 - REVISED

 

 

 

 

All figures are rounded to the nearest million. Changes calculated from unrounded figures.

 

American Association for the Advancement of Science