A Preview Report for
Congressional Action on Research and Development
in the FY 1998 Budget
-
This AAAS R&D Funding Update is a preview of
the forthcoming publication Congressional Action on Research
and Development in the FY 1998 Budget. (Ordering information
is on the last page). This report reflects final FY 1998 appropriations
for research and development.
With his last line-item veto on December 2, President
Clinton put the final touches on FY 1998 appropriations for the
federal investment in research and development (R&D). Although
Congress had long since left Washington after adjourning on November
13, the President waited until November 26 to sign the last few
appropriations bills into law, and FY 1998 appropriations did
not become final until five days later on December 2, the deadline
for his use of the line-item veto.
Every year, AAAS analyzes appropriations as signed
into law and provides detailed estimates on the federal investment
in R&D for the coming fiscal year in the publication Congressional
Action on Research and Development. The FY 1998 edition will
be released in late December. This preview report offers selected
highlights from the book.
Highlights
In the FY 1998 budget process, higher-than-expected
revenues from continued economic growth resulted in a windfall
for discretionary programs. This, combined with renewed support
for R&D as a high national priority, allowed federal support
for R&D in FY 1998 to receive substantial increases across
the board (see Table 1).
-
Total federal support for R&D in FY 1998 is
$76.3 billion, $3.0 billion or 4.1 percent more than FY 1997.
Every major R&D funding agency except Transportation and Agriculture
received increases well ahead of the expected 2.5 percent inflation
rate (see Figure 1).
- The FY 1998 total is $1.5 billion or 2.0 percent
above the President's request. Although the President's request
contained nearly $1 billion for the full construction costs of
various R&D facilities, Congress chose to fund only the FY
1998 installments of these costs. Most other agencies received
more than requested (see Figure 1).

- Total defense R&D for FY 1998 is $41.0 billion,
an increase of 3.1 percent, for defense programs in the Department
of Defense (DOD) and DOE. The budget request was for a smaller,
0.5 percent increase. After adjusting for inflation, defense R&D
has declined 2.7 percent between FY 1994 and FY 1998; however,
it still represents 53.8 percent of total R&D.
- The nondefense R&D total of $35.3 billion for
FY 1998 is $1.8 billion or 5.4 percent more than FY 1997, significantly
ahead of the 2.5 percent expected inflation rate in FY 1998. Because
of cuts in the previous three years, however, nondefense R&D
in FY 1998 is 2.2 percent below FY 1994 in inflation-adjusted
terms.
- The Department of Defense (DOD) has an R&D budget
of $38.1 billion in FY 1998, a $1.0 billion or 2.8 percent increase
over last year. This amount is $1.3 billion more than the President
requested, primarily because of a $704 million supplement to the
request for the Ballistic Missile Defense Organization (total
$3.3 billion). Basic research (the "6.1" account) falls
1.2 percent to $1.1 billion, but applied research, including DOD's
expanding effort in medical research, climbs 7.0 percent to $3.1
billion.
- The National Institutes of Health (NIH) fared
especially well because of strong bipartisan support for its efforts
in biomedical research. NIH's R&D budget for FY 1998 is $13.1
billion, a $871 million or 7.1 percent increase from FY 1997.
Most institutes received increases in the 6 to 8 percent range,
except for the National Human Genome Research Institute ($218
million, up 15.2 percent) and the Office of the Director ($296
million, up 3.6 percent). Although AIDS research did not receive
a separate appropriation, total AIDS research is expected to exceed
$1.6 billion.
- The National Aeronautics and Space Administration
(NASA) has an R&D budget of $9.8 billion (up $493 million
or 5.3 percent) within a total budget of $13.6 billion. $203 million
of the increase will cover cost overruns on the development phase
of the Space Station, for a total of $2.4 billion. Aeronautics
and Space Technology gains 11.3 percent to $1.5 billion in FY
1998 for development of new launch vehicles.
- The Department of Energy (DOE) has an R&D budget
of $6.3 billion for FY 1998, $189 million or 3.1 percent more
than FY 1997. Much of the increase is due to a 6.4 percent jump
in DOE's defense R&D to $3.0 billion, including a 12.7 percent
increase to $1.9 billion for Stockpile Stewardship. General Science
R&D moves up $15 million or 1.5 percent to $1.0 billion. Energy
R&D declines 0.1 percent to $2.3 billion. Increases for R&D
in programs such as Solar and Renewable Energy ($276 million,
up 15.6 percent) and Energy Conservation ($356 million, up 10.0
percent) are offset by rescissions in the Clean Coal Technology
program.
- The National Science Foundation (NSF) received $2.6
billion for its R&D in FY 1998. This is $54 million more than
the request and $149 million or 6.1 percent more than FY 1997.
Major Research Equipment received $109 million, mostly to begin
renovation of U.S. research facilities in Antarctica. The core
Research and Related Activities account totals $2.5 billion, an
increase of 4.7 percent.
- The Department of Commerce's R&D programs received
the largest percentage increase among the agencies: 14.8 percent
or $146 million in FY 1998, for a total of $1.1 billion. The National
Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) received $95 million
to renovate its aging laboratory facilities, in sharp contrast
to a $16 million rescission last year. The Advanced Technology
Program's R&D budget falls to $182 million from $203 million.
R&D in the NIST labs increases by a modest 1.1 percent or
$2 million to $227 million. NOAA's natural resources and environment
R&D totals $613 million, a 9.0 percent increase because of
increasing concern over El Niño and pfiesteria.
- The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) received
$1.6 billion for R&D in FY 1998, a slight increase of 0.5
percent. There are sharp cuts in congressionally designated R&D
facilities projects, allowing for increases for most research
programs.
- The Department of the Interior's (DOI) R&D budget
grows by 6.1 percent in FY 1998 to $616 million. The U.S. Geological
Survey received $538 million for its R&D, $9 million or 1.7
percent more than FY 1997 because of increases for its biological
research activities. The National Park Service's new initiative
on ecosystems research in the Florida Everglades received $20
million.
- The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) emerged
as a big winner among research agencies this year. EPA's R&D
in FY 1998 totals $618 million, $77 million or 14.2 percent more
than FY 1997. Congress is increasingly concerned that EPA's regulatory
activities, especially in particulate matter, be based on sound
science.
- Federal support for basic research, most of which
is performed at the nation's colleges and universities, is estimated
to total $15.5 billion in FY 1998, 4.6 percent or $679 million
more than FY 1997 and $235 million more than the request. As a
result, increases in federal support for academic R&D should
stay ahead of inflation in FY 1998. In the past three years, increases
to basic research have kept pace with inflation. The FY 1998 funding
level is 3.1 percent above the FY 1994 level after adjusting for
inflation.
- The "Federal Science and Technology" (FS&T)
budget, an alternative measure for the federal investment in science
and technology proposed by the National Academy of Sciences, increases
by 5.3 percent in FY 1998 to reach $45.3 billion (corrected 1/28). The growth rate
in FS&T is nearly the same as in nondefense R&D (5.4 percent),
but higher than that of total R&D because defense advanced
development, testing and evaluation programs (DOD accounts "6.4"
through "6.7" and some DOE work), excluded from the
FS&T budget, increase only modestly in FY 1998.
- Most functional categories of R&D see significant
gains in R&D, reflecting the importance of R&D to various
national missions (see Table 2). Health-related R&D leads
the way with $14.1 billion, up 6.6 percent, because of increases
for NIH. Commerce-related R&D sees the biggest percentage
gain (up 22.6 percent) because of funds for laboratory construction.
Natural resources and environment R&D jumps 8.2 percent to
$2.1 billion because of substantial increases for Interior, EPA,
and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).
- Although most agencies received substantial increases
in FY 1998, the longer-term trend is still negative. As Figure
2 shows, between FY 1994 and 1998 only NIH, NSF, and Commerce
managed to keep their R&D budgets ahead of the rate of inflation.
Other agencies suffered large budget cuts in FY 1995 and 1996
and have not recovered lost ground, even after increases in FY
1997 and 1998.

The full report offers 15 detailed funding tables,
several charts, a chronology of the events in the FY 1998 budget
process, an analysis of funding trends, and analyses of the impacts
of the FY 1998 budget on each of the major R&D funding agencies.
Publication Information
The AAAS publication Congressional Action on Research
and Development in the FY 1998 Budget, from which this is
excerpted, will be available in late December from AAAS. Ordering
information is as follows:
Congressional Action on Research and Development
in the FY 1998 Budget, Kei Koizumi, Albert
H. Teich, Stephen D. Nelson, Joanne Padrón Carney, 1997.
AAAS Publication Number 97-20S. $10.95; $8.75 to AAAS members.
The report may be ordered from the AAAS Distribution
Center. Please add $4.00 for postage and handling per order. Orders
must be prepaid by check or accompanied by purchase order payable
to AAAS. Address: AAAS Distribution Center, P.O. Box 521, Annapolis
Junction, MD 20701. For VISA / Mastercard orders call 1-800-222-7809
(8:30 AM - 5:00 PM ET). Fax orders to 301-206-9789. For shipments
to CA and DC, add applicable sales tax. For shipments to Canada,
add the GST. Please allow 2-3 weeks for delivery. Inquiries may
be directed to AAAS (see below).
- December 5, 1997
AAAS R&D Budget and Policy Project
1200 New York Ave., NW
Washington, DC 20005
326-6607; -6600
fax (202) 289-4950
science_policy@aaas.org
WWW: http://www.aaas.org/spp/dspp/rd/rdwwwpg.htm
Table. Total R&D by Agency (FINAL)
Congressional Action on R&D in the FY 1998 Budget
(budget authority in millions of dollars)*
|
|
Action by Congress |
|
|
FY 1997 |
FY 1998 |
FY 1998 |
Chg. from Request |
Chg. from FY 1997 |
|
|
Est. **
|
Request |
FINAL |
Amount |
Percent |
Amount |
Percent |
| .
|
|
Defense (military) |
37,026 |
36,780 |
38,066 |
1,285 |
3.5% |
1,040 |
2.8% |
|
National Aeronautics and Space Admin. |
9,315 |
9,604 |
9,808 |
204 |
2.1% |
493 |
5.3% |
|
Energy |
6,103 |
6,964 |
6,292 |
-673 |
-9.7% |
189 |
3.1% |
|
Health and Human Services |
12,935 |
13,226 |
13,809 |
583 |
4.4% |
874 |
6.8% |
|
National Institutes of Health |
12,206 |
12,531 |
13,077 |
546 |
4.4% |
871 |
7.1% |
|
National Science Foundation |
2,424 |
2,519 |
2,573 |
54 |
2.1% |
149 |
6.1% |
|
Agriculture |
1,544 |
1,483 |
1,551 |
68 |
4.6% |
7 |
0.5% |
|
Interior |
581 |
608 |
616 |
8 |
1.3% |
35 |
6.1% |
|
Transportation
|
650 |
684 |
636 |
-48 |
-7.0% |
-14 |
-2.2% |
|
Environmental Protection Agency |
541 |
579 |
618 |
38 |
6.6% |
77 |
14.2% |
|
Commerce |
983 |
1,088 |
1,128 |
41 |
3.8% |
146 |
14.8% |
|
Education |
185 |
210 |
210 |
0 |
-0.1% |
25 |
13.4% |
|
Agency for International Development |
169 |
225 |
173 |
-52 |
-23.1% |
4 |
2.4% |
|
Department of Veterans Affairs |
271 |
243 |
281 |
38 |
15.8% |
10 |
3.8% |
|
All Other |
525 |
551 |
527 |
-24 |
-4.4% |
2 |
0.3% |
|
|
______ |
______ |
______ |
______ |
|
______ |
|
|
Total R&D |
73,251 |
74,766 |
76,288 |
1,522 |
2.0% |
3,037 |
4.1% |
| . |
|
Defense R&D |
39,801 |
40,457 |
41,018 |
561 |
1.4% |
1,217 |
3.1% |
|
Nondefense R&D |
33,450 |
34,309 |
35,270 |
961 |
2.8% |
1,820 |
5.4% |
| .
|
|
Basic Research |
14,853 |
15,296 |
15,531 |
235 |
1.5% |
679 |
4.6% |
| .
|
|
"FS&T"*** |
43,042 |
44,572 |
45,306 |
734 |
1.6% |
2,264 |
5.3% |
* - Authors' estimates. Includes conduct of R&D and R&D facilities.
** - FY 1997 figures adjusted to reflect rescissions and supplementals enacted in Public Law 105-18.
*** - A new measure of the federal investment in science and technology proposed by the National Academy of Sciences. This figure includes all federal R&D except advanced development, testing and evaluation work in DOD and DOE. CORRECTED from an earlier version of this update.
Table 2. Major Functional Categories of R&D (FINAL)
Congressional Action on R&D in the FY 1998 Budget
(budget authority in millions of dollars)*
|
|
Action by Congress |
|
|
FY 1997 |
FY 1998 |
FY 1998 |
Chg. from Request |
Chg. from FY 1997 |
|
|
Est. **
|
Request |
FINAL |
Amount |
Percent |
Amount |
Percent |
| .
|
|
Defense 1/
|
39,801 |
40,457 |
41,018 |
561 |
1.4% |
1,217 |
3.1% |
| .
|
|
Nondefense 2/
|
33,450 |
34,309 |
35,270 |
961 |
2.8% |
1,820 |
5.4% |
| .
|
|
Space |
8,032 |
8,235 |
8,419 |
184 |
2.2% |
388 |
4.8% |
|
Health |
13,184 |
13,434 |
14,051 |
617 |
4.6% |
867 |
6.6% |
|
Energy |
2,443 |
2,410 |
2,462 |
52 |
2.2% |
19 |
0.8% |
|
General Science |
3,410 |
3,522 |
3,574 |
52 |
1.5% |
164 |
4.8% |
|
Natural Resources & Environment |
1,912 |
1,986 |
2,069 |
84 |
4.2% |
157 |
8.2% |
|
Agriculture |
1,361 |
1,300 |
1,360 |
60 |
4.6% |
-1 |
-0.1% |
|
Transportation |
1,933 |
2,053 |
2,025 |
-28 |
-1.4% |
92 |
4.7% |
|
Commerce |
419 |
515 |
514 |
0 |
-0.1% |
95 |
22.6% |
|
International |
191 |
247 |
195 |
-52 |
-21.0% |
4 |
2.1% |
|
All Other |
564 |
607 |
599 |
-8 |
-1.3% |
35 |
6.3% |
|
|
|
|
______ |
______ |
______ |
______ |
|
______ |
______ |
|
Total R&D |
73,251 |
74,766 |
76,288 |
1,522 |
2.0% |
3,037 |
4.1% |
* Authors' estimates. Includes conduct of R&D and R&D facilities.
** - FY 1997 figures adjusted to reflect rescissions and supplementals enacted in Public Law 105-18. Classifications generally follow the government's budget function categories except health (which here includes health R&D in HHS and VA).
1/ Includes DOD R&D and atomic energy defense R&D in DOE.
2/ Includes all R&D not in defense (domestic and international discretionary programs).