the videos

REPORTS

Anderson, Melissa. "What Would Get You In Trouble: Doctoral Students' Conceptions of Science and Its Norms," Proceedings of ORI Conference on Research on Research Integrity, 2001

American Association for the Advancement of Science. Project on Scientific Fraud and Misconduct: Report on Workshop Number Three (Washington, D.C.: American Association for the Advancement of Science, 1989).

Department of Health and Human Services, Commission on Research Integrity. Integrity and Misconduct in Research (Washington, DC: Office of Research Integrity, November 1995).

DuMez, Elizabeth. The Role and Activities of Scientific Societies in Promoting Research Integrity, Report of a Conference, April 10-11, 2000 (Washington, DC: AAAS, September 2000); http://www.aaas.org/spp/sfrl/projects/report.pdf

Fienberg, Stephen E., Martin, Margaret E., and Straf, Miron L. (Eds.). Sharing Research Data, National Research Council, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Committee on National Statistics (Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1985).

Grayson, Leslie. Scientific Deception: An Overview and Guide to the Literature on Misconduct and Fraud in Scientific Research (London, England: The British Library, 1995).

Institute of Medicine. The Responsible Conduct of Research in the Health Sciences. Committee on the Responsible Conduct of Research (Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1989).

Lubalin, James S., Ardini, Mary-Anne E., and Matheson, Jennifer L. Consequences of Whistleblowing for the Whistleblower in Misconduct in Science Cases, Final Report (Washington, DC: Research Triangle Institute, October 2, 1995).

Macrina, Francis L. Dynamic Issues in Scientific Integrity: Collaborative Research (Washington, DC: American Academy of Microbiology, 1995).

Mishkin, Barbara F. and Bradford, William A., Jr. Scientific Misconduct by Contractors and Grantees, Briefing Papers, Second Series (Washington, DC: Federal Publications, Inc., February 1995).

National Academies of Science, Institute of Medicine. "Town Meeting for Comment on the New Common Federal Definition of Science Misconduct, Policies and Procedures," 1999.

National Academy of Sciences. On Being A Scientist, Committee on the Conduct of Science (Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1995, 2nd Edition).

National Academy of Sciences. Science, Medicine, and Animals, Committee on the Use of Animals in Research (Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1991).

National Science Foundation, Office of the Inspector General. Semiannual Report to the Congress (Washington, DC: National Science Foundation). These semiannual reports describe NSF misconduct cases and summarize the Foundation's misconduct activities.

Office of Research Integrity. Annual Report (Washington, DC: Office of Research Integrity). These annual reports describe and summarize ORI misconduct cases, review educational activities, and identify significant accomplishments of the office; http://ori.dhhs.gov/assurance/electronic_submission.shtml

Office of Research Integrity. Report of the Department of Health and Human Services Review Group on Research Misconduct and Research Integrity (Washington, DC: Office of Research Integrity, July 1999); http://ori.dhhs.gov/documents/report_review_group.pdf

Office of Research Integrity. Analysis of Guidelines for the Conduct of Research Adopted by Medical Schools or their Components (Washington, DC: Office of Research Integrity, September 2001); http://ori.dhhs.gov/documents/analysis_guidelines_research.pdf

Office of Research Integrity. Analysis of Institutional Policies for Responding to Allegations of Scientific Misconduct (Columbia, MD: CHPS Consulting, September 29, 2000); http://ori.dhhs.gov/documents/institutional_policies.pdf

Office of Research Integrity. Scientific Misconduct Investigations: 1993-1997 (Washington, DC: Office of Research Integrity, January 1999); http://ori.dhhs.gov/documents/misconduct_investigations_1993_1997.pdf

Office of Research Integrity. Managing Allegations of Scientific Misconduct: A Guidance Document for Editors (Washington, DC: Office of Research Integrity, January 2000).

Office of Research Integrity. ORI Guidelines for Institutions and Whistleblowers: Responding to Possible Retaliation Against Whistleblowers in Extramural Research (Washington, DC: Office of Research Integrity, November 20, 1995).

Office of Research Integrity. Study of the Incidence of Misconduct Report by Institutions (Rockville, MD: Office of Research Integrity); http://ori.dhhs.gov/publications/misconduct_reported.shtml

Office of Research Integrity. Survey of Accused but Exonerated Individuals in Research Misconduct Cases (Rockville, MD: Office of Research Integrity, June 30, 1996); http://ori.dhhs.gov/publications/exonerated.shtml

Office of Research Integrity. The Whistleblower's Conditional Privilege to Report Allegations of Scientific Misconduct (Rockville, MD: Office of Research Integrity, December, 1993); http://ori.dhhs.gov/documents/whistleblower_conditional.pdf

Panel on Scientific Responsibility and the Conduct of Research, National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine. Responsible Science: Ensuring the Integrity of the Research Process, Volume I (Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1992).

Report of the Committee on Academic Responsibility. Fostering Academic Integrity (Boston, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, April 15, 1992).

Sigma Xi. Honor in Science (Research Triangle Park, NC: Sigma Xi, 1991, 2nd Edition).

Sigma Xi. Ethics, Values, and the Promise of Science (Research Triangle Park, NC: Sigma Xi, 1993).

Sigma Xi. The Responsible Researcher: Paths and Pitfalls (Research Triangle Park, NC: Sigma Xi, The Scientific Research Society, Inc., 1999).



	REPORTS Anderson, Melissa. "What Would Get You In Trouble: Doctoral Students' Conceptions of Science and Its Norms," Proceedings of ORI Conference on Research on Research Integrity, 2001 American Association for the Advancement of Science. Project on Scientific Fraud and Misconduct: Report on Workshop Number Three (Washington, D.C.: American Association for the Advancement of Science, 1989). Department of Health and Human Services, Commission on Research Integrity. Integrity and Misconduct in Research (Washington, DC: Office of Research Integrity, November 1995). DuMez, Elizabeth. The Role and Activities of Scientific Societies in Promoting Research Integrity, Report of a Conference, April 10-11, 2000 (Washington, DC: AAAS, September 2000); http://www.aaas.org/spp/sfrl/projects/report.pdf Fienberg, Stephen E., Martin, Margaret E., and Straf, Miron L. (Eds.). Sharing Research Data, National Research Council, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Committee on National Statistics (Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1985). Grayson, Leslie. Scientific Deception: An Overview and Guide to the Literature on Misconduct and Fraud in Scientific Research (London, England: The British Library, 1995). Institute of Medicine. The Responsible Conduct of Research in the Health Sciences. Committee on the Responsible Conduct of Research (Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1989). Lubalin, James S., Ardini, Mary-Anne E., and Matheson, Jennifer L. Consequences of Whistleblowing for the Whistleblower in Misconduct in Science Cases, Final Report (Washington, DC: Research Triangle Institute, October 2, 1995). Macrina, Francis L. Dynamic Issues in Scientific Integrity: Collaborative Research (Washington, DC: American Academy of Microbiology, 1995). Mishkin, Barbara F. and Bradford, William A., Jr. Scientific Misconduct by Contractors and Grantees, Briefing Papers, Second Series (Washington, DC: Federal Publications, Inc., February 1995). National Academies of Science, Institute of Medicine. "Town Meeting for Comment on the New Common Federal Definition of Science Misconduct, Policies and Procedures," 1999. National Academy of Sciences. On Being A Scientist, Committee on the Conduct of Science (Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1995, 2nd Edition). National Academy of Sciences. Science, Medicine, and Animals, Committee on the Use of Animals in Research (Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1991). National Science Foundation, Office of the Inspector General. Semiannual Report to the Congress (Washington, DC: National Science Foundation). These semiannual reports describe NSF misconduct cases and summarize the Foundation's misconduct activities. Office of Research Integrity. Annual Report (Washington, DC: Office of Research Integrity). These annual reports describe and summarize ORI misconduct cases, review educational activities, and identify significant accomplishments of the office; http://ori.dhhs.gov/assurance/electronic_submission.shtml Office of Research Integrity. Report of the Department of Health and Human Services Review Group on Research Misconduct and Research Integrity (Washington, DC: Office of Research Integrity, July 1999); http://ori.dhhs.gov/documents/report_review_group.pdf Office of Research Integrity. Analysis of Guidelines for the Conduct of Research Adopted by Medical Schools or their Components (Washington, DC: Office of Research Integrity, September 2001); http://ori.dhhs.gov/documents/analysis_guidelines_research.pdf Office of Research Integrity. Analysis of Institutional Policies for Responding to Allegations of Scientific Misconduct (Columbia, MD: CHPS Consulting, September 29, 2000); http://ori.dhhs.gov/documents/institutional_policies.pdf Office of Research Integrity. Scientific Misconduct Investigations: 1993-1997 (Washington, DC: Office of Research Integrity, January 1999); http://ori.dhhs.gov/documents/misconduct_investigations_1993_1997.pdf Office of Research Integrity. Managing Allegations of Scientific Misconduct: A Guidance Document for Editors (Washington, DC: Office of Research Integrity, January 2000). Office of Research Integrity. ORI Guidelines for Institutions and Whistleblowers: Responding to Possible Retaliation Against Whistleblowers in Extramural Research (Washington, DC: Office of Research Integrity, November 20, 1995). Office of Research Integrity. Study of the Incidence of Misconduct Report by Institutions (Rockville, MD: Office of Research Integrity); http://ori.dhhs.gov/publications/misconduct_reported.shtml Office of Research Integrity. Survey of Accused but Exonerated Individuals in Research Misconduct Cases (Rockville, MD: Office of Research Integrity, June 30, 1996); http://ori.dhhs.gov/publications/exonerated.shtml Office of Research Integrity. The Whistleblower's Conditional Privilege to Report Allegations of Scientific Misconduct (Rockville, MD: Office of Research Integrity, December, 1993); http://ori.dhhs.gov/documents/whistleblower_conditional.pdf Panel on Scientific Responsibility and the Conduct of Research, National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine. Responsible Science: Ensuring the Integrity of the Research Process, Volume I (Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1992). Panel on Scientific Responsibility and the Conduct of Research, National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine. Responsible Science: Ensuring the Integrity of the Research Process, Volume II (Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1993). Report of the Committee on Academic Responsibility. Fostering Academic Integrity (Boston, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, April 15, 1992). Sigma Xi. Honor in Science (Research Triangle Park, NC: Sigma Xi, 1991, 2nd Edition). Sigma Xi. Ethics, Values, and the Promise of Science (Research Triangle Park, NC: Sigma Xi, 1993). Sigma Xi. The Responsible Researcher: Paths and Pitfalls (Research Triangle Park, NC: Sigma Xi, The Scientific Research Society, Inc., 1999).