SciLine Scores Successes in First Five Months of Operation
Reporter Mary Landers was puzzled when she received a press release in the fall announcing that the deaths of up to 24 green sea turtles would be considered allowable in an operation to deepen Savannah’s harbor, raising an earlier limit that had already been reached with three green turtle deaths.
“I needed to find an outside expert who was conversant with how those numbers are set,” she said, acknowledging that she wondered why when the first limit — set by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Fisheries and presumably based on biological evidence — was surpassed, a new, higher limit was allowed.
SciLine staff Karl Eisenhower, Meredith Drosback, Becky Hazen and Rick Weiss | Courtesy of Rick Weiss
Landers, who works for the Savannah Morning News, contacted SciLine, a AAAS-hosted initiative aimed at incorporating more scientific evidence into the news. Within a day or two, she had spoken with three wildlife experts who were recommended by SciLine, learning that accurate reporting on the situation would indicate that this was an example not of controversial practices but of competing interests working together.
“All three of the researchers said pretty much the same thing,” Landers said, explaining that while no one wants the turtles to die, protection efforts are based on whether the population — which in this case is threatened but recovering — will be affected by a certain number of deaths caused by operations such as harbor dredging. “They’ll look at the number that were ‘taken,’ and then they’ll figure out whether a new limit can be set.”
“They told me this is a common practice,” Landers said. Her resulting article also explained that the wildlife researchers were impressed with the efforts in place to protect the turtles, including requiring trawls to scoop them up and move them to safer ground before dredging began.
In this era of budget-constrained newsrooms, specialized science reporters are increasingly rare, and general-assignment and freelance reporters cover more science news, often without networks of good science sources and while facing multiple deadlines per day. The idea behind SciLine is to help journalists quickly get to scientifically derived evidence by building a community of articulate science experts who are available to the journalists on deadline.
Launched in late October 2017, the initiative required a certain leap of faith that both writers and scientific experts would take part, according to SciLine Director Rick Weiss.
“If we built it,” Weiss said, “would they come?”
In fact, the service has been very successful, attracting reporters from publications such as the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, The New York Times and National Geographic and from regional and smaller media outlets. SciLine has provided referrals of more than 140 scientists from 33 states and the District of Columbia, with most of the resulting stories featuring quotes from those experts. At the same time, the number of scientists who have connected with SciLine as potential sources has reached nearly 6,500.
“Each interaction with a reporter is a chance not only to get the science right in a particular story,” said AAAS CEO Rush Holt, “but to help thousands of readers gain appreciation of the importance of evidence over unsubstantiated assertions.”
Financial support for SciLine is provided by the Quadrivium Foundation, with additional funding from the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, the Heinz Endowments, the John S. and James L. Knight Foundation and the Rita Allen Foundation. AAAS provides in-kind support.
Since SciLine began, requests have been surprisingly specific, Weiss said. One reporter asked for a source with expertise in marine geology who was familiar with a flood theorized to have moved through the Mediterranean Sea about 6 million years ago. SciLine provided two such experts.
Researcher Caitlin Pepperell said she joined SciLine’s list of expert sources because she thinks communicating with journalists broadens the impact of her work.
“We need the support and engagement of the general public and of course government and private funding agencies, and it’s always useful to practice articulating what is interesting and important in our research,” said Pepperell, who works at the University of Wisconsin–Madison. “I also saw it as an opportunity to raise the profile of women in science, to increase the diversity of voices and perspectives that make up the ‘face’ of science — my hope is that all young people have the opportunity to see themselves as scientists, to consider science as a career and pursue it if that’s where their passions and skills lie.”
With Weiss and his colleagues planning for more growth, SciLine will soon launch a virtual media briefing service to get reporters up to speed on advances in certain areas of science by offering presentations by panels of experts, who will also take reporters’ questions. The SciLine staff, which has already gone from three to five in its first five months, will also continue to develop easy-to-use and meticulously vetted fact sheets for reporters on topical science subjects such as gravitational waves and lead in drinking water.
The staff will also visit newsrooms across the country to talk with journalists about how they cover science, and will undertake a nationwide survey of newsrooms, “which should help SciLine understand the fast-changing landscape and make any needed course corrections to make sure we are doing the most we can to help reporters enrich their stories with scientifically derived facts,” said Weiss.
Landers, at the Savannah Morning News, said she intends to make a habit of using SciLine.
“I got a great response from SciLine,” Landers said. “I had three different academics, and they were all great. They got it. They understood what the needs were for a newspaper and responded perfectly.”
For more information or to register with SciLine as an expert source or a journalist, please go https://www.sciline.org/
A version of this article was published in AAAS News & Notes in the March 30 issue of Science.