Citation: Disasters, 2008, 32, 3, 449 – 466
In areas of war and armed conflict it is difficult to get trustworthy and coherent information. Civil society and human rights groups often face problems of dealing with fragmented witness reports, disinformation of war propaganda, and difficult direct access to these areas. Turkish Kurdistan was used as a case study of armed conflict to evaluate the potential use of satellite images for verification of witness reports collected by human rights groups. The Turkish army was reported to be burning forests, fields and villages as a strategy in the conflict against guerrilla uprising. This paper concludes that satellite images are useful to validate witness reports of forest fires. Even though the use of this technology for human rights groups will depend on some feasibility factors such as prices, access and expertise, the images proved to be key for analysis of spatial aspects of conflict and valuable for reconstructing a more trustworthy picture.
• Related Content
Projects
Ushahidi — Tracking xenophobic attacks in South…
ISFEREA — Enumeration of refugee camps (2003…
IMN — Indigenous Remote Sensing Collaborative.
Publications
After the Killing Fields: Lessons from the Cambodian Genocide. Craig Etchenson
Towards a Human Rights Observing System. Lars Bromley
Interpreting Optical Remote Sensing Images.
Programs
UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs
ISFEREA – Geo-Spatial Information Analysis for Global Security and Stability
Famine Early Warning System Network (FEWS Net)
Data and Tools
Gridded Population of the World, v3. Center for International Earth Science Information Network…
European Commission Joint Research Center Fuzzy Matcher. European Commission Joint Research Center