A year after the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the value of diverse learning environments but struck down formulaic or points-based approaches to undergraduate admissions, AAAS issued this report to clarify legally defensible options for protecting diversity in science and engineering programs.
Emerging from a recent invitation-only think-tank sponsored by the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, Standing Our Ground provides legal guidance on two Michigan rulings that affirmed the importance of a diverse learning environment, but struck down the use of race as a quantitative "plus factor" in undergraduate admissions decisions. The mixed Grutter and Gratz messages, issued in June 2003, triggered confusion among academic, non-profit, and federal institutions seeking to extend the benefits of education to all.
Standing Our Ground also features a "legal primer" to help guide university counsels in interpreting the Grutter and Gratz rulings. It also describes eight "design principles" that may serve as a checklist.
To request a hard copy of Standing Our Ground, email
The report may be reproduced in whole or part without AAAS permission. However, the authors would appreciate notification of such reproduction through the e-mail address below.
Table of Contents
A. Report of the Joint AAAS/NACME Conference
Select Data Compendium
B. Conference Agenda
Setting the Stage - Timeline
The Beauty of Diverse Talent - Shirley Ann Jackson
Science, Technology, and America's Future - C.M. Vest
C. Background Readings
Reprint: "The Long Road to Race-Blindness" (Science, vol. 302, Oct. 24, 2003) - Thomas J. Kane; Part 1; Part 2
D. Responses to Freedom of Information Act Requests
Please note that the Adobe Acrobat Reader program must be installed on your computer to do this. Adobe Acrobat Reader is free software that lets you view and print Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files on all major computer platform.
See also news release, "New AAAS/NACME Study Details Latest Options for Protecting Diversity in S&T Fields."