Skip to main content

Which Came First? Toxic Facilities, Minority Move-In, and Environmental Justice

Citation: Pastor, Jr., Manuel, et al. 2001. ?Which Came First? Toxic Facilities, Minority Move-In, and Environmental Justice.? Journal of Urban Affairs 23(1): 1-21.

Previous research suggests that minority residential areas have a disproportionate likelihood of hosting various environmental hazards. Some critics have responded that the contemporary correlation of race and hazards may reflect post-siting minority move-in, perhaps because of a risk effect on housing costs, rather than discrimination in siting. This article examines the disproportionate siting and minority move-in hypotheses in Los Angeles County by reconciling tract geography and data over three decades with firm-level information on the initial siting dates for toxic storage and disposal facilities. Using simple t-tests, logit analysis, and a novel simultaneous model, we find that disproportionate siting matters more than disproportionate minority move-in in the sample area. Racial transition is also an important predictor of siting, suggesting a role for multiracial organizing in resisting new facilities.

Related Content

ISFEREA — Scientific and technical support to

ISFEREA — Refugee and Internally Displaced Persons

Geospatial Technologies and Human Rights. AAAS

Geospatial Analysis: A Comprehensive Guide to Principles, Techniques and Software….

Warviews: Visualizing and Animating Geographic Data on Civil War.

High-Resolution Satellite Imagery and Possible Mass Graves in Sheberghan, Afghanistan.

AAAS Science and Human Rights Program

ISFEREA – Geo-Spatial Information Analysis for Global Security and Stability

Data and Tools
NASA Satellite Data and Imagery Resources – Warehouse Inventory Search….

LandScan. Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) Global Population Project

Global Land Cover Facility. University of Maryland Department of Geography